There is an article in the Guardian online about Amazon’s AutoRip feature. It raises a series of questions about the use of data that is captured about our music listening and how this may shape consumer activity. It also raises some interesting points about how this particular feature feeds into questions about the materiality of cultural objects. The questions of course relate to the separation of physical and virtual objects in music consumption. I’ve been covering this with my students this week. We’ve been using Walter Benjamin, Daniel Miller, Sherry Turkle and Marjorie Kibby’s work to try to think through the importance of the material properties of objects. We’ve also been thinking about how these relations change as the nature of these objects change. What we found was that there is quite a complex interweaving of different types of cultural objects being use. What the AutoRip example shows is how complex the interweaving of different forms of materiality now is. I don’t think anyone has really managed to get at the details of these changes so far.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2020
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
Categories
Meta